Ansys donne les moyens à la prochaine génération d'ingénieurs
Les étudiants ont accès gratuitement à un logiciel de simulation de classe mondiale.
Concevez votre avenir
Connectez-vous à Ansys pour découvrir comment la simulation peut alimenter votre prochaine percée.
Les étudiants ont accès gratuitement à un logiciel de simulation de classe mondiale.
Connectez-vous à Ansys pour découvrir comment la simulation peut alimenter votre prochaine percée.
At dinner with a few engineers and product leaders, someone asked, “Is AI actually useful in simulation, or is it just the trend of the decade?” Short answer: AI isn’t a stunt. It’s steadily influencing how we simulate, how quickly we learn, and how confidently we decide. The headlines focus on chatbots, but the real action is inside solvers, across workflows, and in how teams plan experiments.
Simulation helps us “see” the invisible — stress hot spots in a bracket, airflow over a wing, microscale effects that shape macro performance. Classic high-fidelity finite element method (FEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) remain trusted for accuracy, but they can be compute-intensive and expertise-heavy. Artificial intelligence (AI) is not replacing physics; AI is augmenting it.
Think of AI as a set of accelerators and co-pilots that may:
In large models, domain decomposition methods (DDMs) split a big problem into subproblems that run in parallel and then stitch results together. A modern AI-inspired twist is learning-augmented DDM, in which deep-learning models learn patterns in subdomains and across interfaces so the solver can start closer to a solution and potentially converge in fewer iterations. A subsequent physics-based correction step is typically applied, which can help preserve numerical robustness and reduce wall time for suitable problems. Actual benefits are problem-dependent and should be confirmed against trusted benchmarks.
Artificial intelligence (AI) + domain decomposition to speed up simulation runs
Why should executives care? Mechanical, aerospace, energy, and semiconductor models keep growing. An approach that reduces iterations without rewriting core solvers can mean shorter queues, faster turnarounds on late-stage changes, and less pressure to over-provision clusters — subject to validation and governance.
Three families of surrogates are moving from papers to practice in some settings:
Surrogates don’t replace your baseline “truth” model; they front-load learning. You may run the faster surrogate to reach directionally useful conclusions, then reserve high-fidelity cycles for a short list of candidates. Always document training data, limits of applicability, and validation results.
A recurring bottleneck in multiscale modeling is data scarcity. Generative models — generative adversarial networks (GANs) and diffusion models — can produce realistic 2D/3D microstructures (for example, bone, porous media, and composites) that match target statistics reported in the literature. Teams use these as inputs to homogenization or FE² workflows to explore structure-property-process trade-offs without relying solely on new scans or destructive tests. As with any synthesized data, traceability, representativeness, and validation are essential.
Why this matters
AI is not a substitute for physics-based modeling. Used correctly, it accelerates established workflows and improves the quality and traceability of decisions.
Pragmatic first steps
Governance essentials
Version your data and models, cite sources, restrict sensitive access, and route to human review when confidence is low.
Illustrative examples of generative microstructures synthesized using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and diffusion models
Why it matters: Larger, better-curated libraries can enable smarter screening. You can discover non-obvious material configurations earlier, reduce imaging or lab time, and focus physical experiments where they’re most relevant to making decisions.
Before any solver runs, teams need clean, labeled geometry. Segmentation is the step that converts raw data — CT/MRI volumes, micro-CT of materials, optical images, or lidar/point clouds — into regions a solver understands (organs versus vessels, phases in a composite, defects versus base material, components in an assembly). Done well, it reduces manual cleanup, speeds meshing, and makes boundary conditions and material assignments repeatable.
Illustration of the segmentation process to label intricate regions in material microstructures for subsequent material property assignment
Where AI helps:
Workflow considerations with AI-assisted segmentation:
Using AI in the segmentation stage can provide faster, more consistent preprocessing; fewer late-stage surprises from mislabeled regions; and clearer traceability for audits, manufacturing quality, or clinical review. As always, results are problem-dependent and should be validated against trusted benchmarks before being widely adopted.
A surprising amount of engineering time lives in the process around simulation — geometry cleanup, meshing notes, convergence troubleshooting, result summaries, and compliance reports. Large language models (LLMs) paired with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can assist with the glue work, such as answering setup questions with references to your internal standards, drafting run plans and postprocessing scripts, and turning raw plots into management-ready narratives.
Large language model (LLM) + retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to streamline the simulation workflow
Two principles keep this approach useful and controlled:
Differentiable simulation frameworks bring automatic differentiation to physics kernels, enabling shape and topology optimization, control tuning, and materials calibration with direct gradients. This does not replace classic adjoint methods across the board; rather, it broadens access where adjoints are difficult to implement. As always, applicability and performance should be evaluated on a per-problem basis.
From a business standpoint, differential simulation frameworks result in fewer black-box optimizations and more principled trade-offs, with faster convergence toward designs that balance performance, cost, and manufacturability — when supported by rigorous verification and validation (V&V).
Using digital twins to test process changes in industrial machinery before implementing production-level tweaks
The Ansys Advantage blog, featuring contributions from Ansys and other technology experts, keeps you updated on how Ansys simulation is powering innovation that drives human advancement.